Hadith 39: Actions Done By Mistakes, Forgetfulness
and Under Duress is Pardoned
By Imam Nawawi
In the name of Allāh, the Most Gracious, the Most
Merciful;
All the praise and Thanks is due to Allāh, the Lord of
al-‘ālameen. I testify that there is none worthy of worship except Allāh, and
that Muhammad, Sallallāhu ‘alayhi wasallam, is His Messenger
Ibn Abbas, (radiyallahu’anhu),
reported that the Messenger of Allah, (Sallallāhu ‘alayhi wasallam), said:
"Truly Allah has for my sake pardoned the
mistakes and forgetfulness of my community, and for what they have done under
force or duress."
[A fine hadith related
by Ibn Majah, Al-Baihaqi and others]
Background
What has been stated in this hadith has also been stressed and emphasised in the Qur'an. Allah
stated:"Our
Lord, punish us not if we forget or fall into error." [Surah al-Baqarah, 2: 286] (Another translation
for the meaning of the ayah :) "Oh our Lord, do not take us to task if we forget or
make mistakes."
Allah says : “And there is no sin on you concerning that
in which you made a mistake, except in regard to what your hearts deliberately
intended. And Allah is Ever Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful” [Surah
al-Ahzab,33: 5]
Allah also says: “Whosoever disbelieved in Allah after his
belief, except him who is forced thereto and whose heart is at rest with faith
or at certainty”. [Surah al-Nahl,16: 106]
Lessons
Being excused for what is done mistakenly or out of
forgetfulness does not mean that there will be no consequent rulings. This
means that a person might be forgiven but he still has to take responsibility
for his actions. The consequent rulings for doing something mistakenly or out
of forgiveness can be classified into three categories:
1. There are mistakes where there is no consequent ruling
such as a person or a Muslim who eats during the day in the month of Ramadhan
out of forgetfulness. The majority of scholars say that his fasting is still
valid and he does not have to repeat that day. This opinion is based on the hadith
that is related by Imam Al-Bukhari and Imam
Muslim which states that "any Muslim who eats during Ramadhan out of
forgetfulness will be excused and forgiven."
2. There are consequent rulings to actions that are done out
of mistakes or forgetfulness such as if someone kills a Muslim by mistake - as
what happens nowadays in car accidents or accidents at work, etc. It is
well-known by scholars that for such a person there is no consequent ruling.
There is no kaffarah (expiation of sins) but he has to pay the fidyah as stated in the Qur'an. Another
example is if someone caused harm or damage to the property or money of someone
else by mistake. In this case the person is responsible and has to compensate
for what he has damaged even though he is forgiven by Allah and is not being
regarded as sinful.
3. There are actions where there are different opinions
among the Muslim scholars of whether there is a consequent ruling or not. Some
scholars say that the person has a consequent ruling. Others will say that he
is fully excused and has nothing to do. For example, if a person talked out of
forgetfulness during his prayer. Does he have to repeat his prayer? Here we
have different opinions among the scholars. Some will say he has to repeat
while others will say he is going to be forgiven and excused.
Another example is that a person takes an oath or swears by
Allah not to do something and then he does it out of mistake or because of
forgetfulness. Is this person responsible? Some scholars will say he is not
forgiven and he has to make kaffarah.
Others will say that he is forgiven and need not make kaffarah. A
third example is if a person who is muhrim -
that is he intended to perform 'umrah or hajj and then by mistake he hunts
or kills an animal. Is he forgiven (i.e. is this not considered a sinful act)?
He is forgiven and will not be punished
for that. But the issue is whether he has to pay for it and be responsible or
not. This is again a debatable issue among the scholars. Ibn Rajab
(rahimahullah) states that the person who acts out of forgetfulness or by
mistake is excused and that the sinfulness will be removed because sinfulness
is related to those who does it deliberately.
But the ruling, whatever the responsibility is, is not meant
by this hadith. The hadith does not mean that they are going to
be excused from everything including any kind of responsibility or rulings.
This is something very important to know because some Muslims have the
misconception that they are totally excused and they do not have to bear any
consequences.
In the situation where a person is forced to do something
which is not acceptable in Islam, this ikrah or duress can be categorised, according to Ibn
Rajab (rahimahullah), into two categories:
1. The person is powerless and has no choice to refuse doing
an evil act or something which is not acceptable by shari'ah.
Ibn Rajab (rahimahullah) says that he is excused.
2. The person is forced to harm someone else. In this
situation, we look at the issue from the perspective that he has the power over
his actions and can refuse to do the harm but at the same time his intention is
to remove the harm from himself rather than to harm the other person. What is
the ruling in this case? The scholars say that there are certain cases where
the Muslim should not do it (i.e. harm someone else) even if he is harmed
himself, such as if a Muslim is forced
to kill someone else. He is not allowed to do so because this is a major harm
that Muslims should do their best to avoid.
But the scholars have different views regarding similar
situations and actions. The first situation is that if a Muslim took an oath
not to do something and then he is forced to do it. Some say that he is excused
and he is allowed to do the thing that he promised not to do - he is excused
and there is no ruling here. Other scholars say he is responsible and he should
not do it. If it is out of his choice, this goes under the first category. The
same if someone is forced or threaten or even beaten and he has been ordered to
cause damage to the property of someone else. Scholars say since he has the
choice, he has to do his best not to cause the damage. The issue here is that
if he does it, scholars say that he will be excused in the sense that he is not
sinful but he still remains responsible for the damage that he caused.
The second situation where Muslim scholars differ is
prohibited acts such as drinking wine. Some scholars say if a person is forced,
then he is excused. Other scholars say though he is forced, he is not allowed
to do it.
Another view or category is the distinction between speech
and actions. In terms of speech, a person might be forced and allowed to say
something that is not allowable. The scholars say he should not practice taqiyah. Taqiyah
means to say or do something which you do not believe in and are not
satisfied with. This only applies to sayings and not actions. Regarding this
issue there is an agreement among the Muslim scholars. They say that whoever is
forced to say something that is not allowed in shari'ah, then he will be
allowed to say it - he will not be regarded or considered as 'saying' it. There
is another condition that the scholars set. They say that whenever a person is
put into ikrah or duress, the duress should be definite and most likely
to happen and not just something the person imagines or assumes. He has to be
sure.
What is mentioned in this hadith should not be abused. Some Muslims today abuse what the hadith implies by using it as an
excuse to not uphold a responsibility or to break a promise. Allah knows our
intentions and we should not take what is mentioned in the hadith to get away from the
responsibility of fulfilling a commitment or an obligation.
Conclusion
Islam encourages ihsan,
quality, excellence at work, and a sense of responsibility. At the same time,
Islam discourages recklessness, carelessness, and heedlessness. However, Islam
takes into account the nature of human beings and their shortcomings. It also
takes into consideration the unavoidable situations that they may undergo. It
should also be noticed that Islam calls for taking lessons from our mistakes
and our experience with others. That's why the Prophet Muhammad, (sallallahu 'alayhi wasallam), says a
Muslim should not be bitten from the same hole twice.
We should also be aware (based on Hadith 32) not to harm
others. That hadith says: "There should
be neither harming nor reciprocating harm." According to this hadith we have to minimise the size
of the harm and the consequences of the mistakes as much as possible. Even
though the person might be excused and forgiven by one of these factors that
are mentioned in the hadith, he
still has to bear the full responsibility of his actions or deeds.
We should look at this in a positive way. Islam does not
encourage people to become reckless,
careless, or to feel that they are unaccountable. We should look at the hadith as a total picture of the
situation and not to look at it in an isolated manner. We should have a
complete view of what Islam has already established or stressed such as
excellence in our performance, accountability and many other issues that we
have to observe. But because we are human beings and subject to committing
mistakes out of forgetfulness, Islam still leaves room for these human
shortcomings and makes it possible for them to be excused and forgiven - but
they have to bear some of the consequences.
And Allāh Almighty Knows best.
[Excerpted from commentary on Hadith 39: “Actions Done By Mistakes,
Forgetfulness and Under Duress is Pardoned”, 40 Hadiths of Imam Nawawi, By Dr.
Jamal Ahmed Badi, via IC
Truth]
No comments:
Post a Comment